These days it seems the white girl’s burden is to sacrificed on the altar of virtue signaling by the right-on social justice types. Unless the white girl is herself a suitably right-on SJW, she is apparently fair game to be taken advantage of, raped or even killed by those higher up in the victimology hierarchy. Those who take her side and try to get some kind of justice, or to stop similar things happening again, are also to be discredited, demoted, and generally piled on until they recant. Even if, perhaps especially if, they are also female and of a “progressive” political persuasion.

The current example of this is the way that the British Labour party is busily ostracizing politicians who think that the various “asian” sex abuse rings are a scandal that needs some root cause analysis. Rotherham MP Sarah Champion wrote an article a couple of weeks ago for the Sun in which she started by writing:

BRITAIN has a problem with British Pakistani men raping and exploiting white girls.

There. I said it. Does that make me a racist? Or am I just prepared to call out this horrifying problem for what it is?

For too long we have ignored the race of these abusers and, worse, tried to cover it up.

No more. These people are predators and the common denominator is their ethnic heritage.

We have to have grown-up conversations, however unpalatable, or in six months’ time we will be having this same scenario all over again.

The irony of all of this is that, by not dealing with the ethnicity of the abusers as a fact, political correctness has actually made the situation about race.

The perpetrators are criminals and we need to deal with them as such, not shy away from doing the right thing by fearing being called a racist.

I’m writing this as I don’t know what else to do to try and protect our children from grooming and sexual abuse by gangs.

Well this did indeed get her to be called racist, Islamophobe and so on, and she tried and failed to walk it back. In fact once Guido had shown that her initial attempts to pass the buck to the Sun editors was BS, she was forced to abase herself and resign from the shadow cabinet. Subsequently another Labour party politican, a councilor in nearby Manchester and would-be MP, has been deselected from her council position. This lady is, it seems, of the Pakistani persuasion and indeed is probably a practicing Muslim. However, as well as campaigning for basic things like gender equality in her own community, she also defended Ms Champion:

“I grew up in a Muslim community where these attitudes were common. “White girls are easy” “Nobody cares about them” “They are just slags” “They parents don’t look after them properly” etc were/are still said today. I hear it regularly. Sarah Champion was talking about a particular type of grooming which is carried by men because of their cultural/religious practices. Obvs not all men. She is not a racist but a brave woman speaking out about a politically awkward issue. Labour, bury your heads as much as you like in the black & white purist world you push. The chickens will come home to roost.”

A large part of the scandal in Rotherham, and other similar scandals in Oxford, Newcastle etc., was that many (most? all?) of the girls who ended up being groomed and abused were in the care of the local authorities and were in foster homes or institutions. When these girls attempted to report their abuse the various officials tended to ignore them or even do the victim blaming that feminists get worked up about when the alleged attacker is a white male frat boy. Needless to say, despite all the official inquiries and reports and so on, these officials and their superiors have all faced minimal punishment. Certainly no one has been prosecuted for child endangerment or similar, which they would be if it were a family that allowed their children to be groomed. In fact the whole child protection services/fostercare system in the UK seems ripe for a significant overhaul. While Christian “anti-gay” foster parents get into trouble when they try to adopt children they are fostering, it is apparently perfectly fine for a 5 year old white girl to be fostered by fundamentalist muslims:

A white Christian child was taken from her family and forced to live with a niqab-wearing foster carer in a home where she was allegedly encouraged to learn Arabic.

The five-year-old girl, a native English speaker, has spent the past six months in the care of two Muslim households in London. The foster placements were made, against the wishes of the girl’s family, by the scandal-ridden borough of Tower Hamlets.

In confidential local authority reports seen by The Times, a social services supervisor describes the child sobbing and begging not to be returned to the foster carer’s home because “they don’t speak English”.

According to the Sun these foster parents made no attempt to tolerate her culture or desires:

A FIVE-year-old Christian girl was forced to live with a foster carer who wears a niqab face veil and told to learn Arabic.

The white English-speaking child allegedly also had to remove a necklace with a cross.[…]

The girl is said to have told her mother that “Christmas and Easter are stupid” and that “European women are stupid and alcoholic”.

In the reports, a social services worker described the girl as being “very distressed”.

It is understood she was not allowed to eat her favourite food, carbonara, because it contained bacon.

Note the repetition of the belief that “European women are stupid and alcoholic”. It has to be said that when you look at the average British town centre on a Friday or Saturday night, or when you look at popular TV shows and newspapers, it is quite easy to gain that impression. However, as the feminists try to point out when they do slut-walks, dressing provocatively and getting inebriated does not imply consent. Yet somehow it seems that, as Ms Champion also pointed out, an entire swathe of people do apparently believe this. Willfully closing one’s eyes to the common traits does not in fact help anyone in the long term and condemns a large number of vulnerable girls to entirely avoidable abuse. However it seems that even reporting what members of that particular swathe says publicly, let alone criticising it, is racist, islamophobic and so on.

Not that the Pakistani/Bangladeshi Muslim community reserves its sexism to white girls. They also inflict the patriarchy on their own sisters and daughters in ways that would have a feminist frothing at the mouth if only they were, say, Christian. Imaging taking the text at the link above and making suitable replacements with Catholic and Irish for Muslim and Pakistani as in the following:

Catholic women who enter politics broadly fall into two camps according to community elders: either they are compliant, homely and happy to agree with everything that the men agree on or they outspoken, critical and want to change the status quo. It is the latter of the two women that do not last long in community based politics. A Keighley based local councillor complained she was forced to attend meetings with her brother, her husband or another male member until it was established that she was capable of being alone with men without a chaperone.

The men in these types of predominantly Irish political circles prefers to see women as the toys from the Churchill advert; nodding their heads repeatedly while not saying a single word while expected to dress modestly and wear a scarf at all times during political meetings.

The timings of meetings always seem to take place after business hours; not surprising if the men are local businessmen or professionals that have a 9-5 job. But often this is very difficult for Catholic women, who have caring duties of their own families or elderly parents. This has been an issue for many years. Huddersfield councillor [Maureen Murphy] spoke out about these anti-social hours back in 2009. Sadly, nothing seems to have changed.

Those who do attend late night meetings are often questioned over their character. An Irish woman was told to go home at 10:30pm after attending a political event in Bradford because ‘only loose women were seen out of the home at that time’ and ‘didn’t she care about her reputation?’

Do you not think that such an article would be rocketing around the twattersphere with retweets and #hashtags? But because it’s about Muslims and Pakistanis I’m pretty sure that the  people who retweet it will be reviled for their Islamaphobia, Racism and Intolerance. As indeed will any article criticizing the culture these people live in. Just look at how people skate around touchy concepts like forced marriage and the effects of repeated cousin marriage (birth defects, low intelligence…). The fact that modern feminists and SJWs are so selectively outraged is a scandal. The fact that the current leadership of the UK Labour Party is in thrall to these types shows just how much of a lie their claims to seek justice for all are. The fact that both these groups seem to be notably lacking in representatives from actual working class backgrounds is undoubtedly not a coincidence.

The fact that they might just win an election should have everyone with any sort of empathy for vulnerable girls quaking in their boots.